Ok, but what exactly is the Remote Viewing procedure?
Remote Viewing is distinguished by several features that distinguish the RV from traditional, broadly understood “clairvoyance”.

In scientific experiments conducted for military intelligence, one of the most important things was to establish whether extrasensory perception actually works under objective conditions and whether it is possible to train someone from scratch to use it.

Initially, empty, neutral gray rooms were used for RV sessions, with nothing to stimulate the imagination, and the procedure was done in such a way as to absolutely eliminate the possibility of suggesting to the Remote Viewer what is the subject of the study.

Here we come to the first pillar of Remote Viewing:

1. “Blind conditions”

One of the biggest objection to clairvoyants and extrasensory users in general, from skeptics, has always been that the results may come from guessing something about the purpose of the study from the information someone gives them. If a person comes to a clairvoyant and says “I have such and such a problem”, and then wants to find out something that will help him or her solve this problem, even if the clairvoyant actually uses extrasensory perception, the answer is not evidence of the use of clairvoyance, because it can also be considered that the “clairvoyant” person might have guessed the correct answer based on given knowledge.

The first step in Remote Viewing is to eliminate the possibility of suggesting and using your imagination to guess what the answer may be.
For this purpose, so-called “sessions in blind” are conducted. It consists in the fact that the Remote Viewer person receives only the number, which is the indication of the target. Nothing more. The number is usually a string of about five digits that has been randomly assigned to a given target. So if someone is to research with the help of Remote Viewing, for example, what is happening now, for example, in Africa in such and such a city, in such and such a building, then he receives only the number that has been assigned for this purpose. Thus, the perceiver has zero information about what is being examined. When starting the session, he focuses on the received number and the intention to receive information about the target through extrasensory perception. He then begins to describe (aloud or in writing) the impressions he receives from the target.

Some believe that doing so may mean that the perceiving person may be using telepathy unconsciously and reading target information from the mind of the person who gave the number and knows the target. However, experiments have repeatedly shown that the information obtained in this way contained knowledge of the target that was not available to the person giving the number.

In addition, double and triple blind tests were also carried out, i.e. where the person giving the target number was subsequently unrelated to the testing process and the results were still positive.

2. Division into roles

The second pillar of what has been established thanks to the Remote Viewing experiments is the fact that the division into roles during RV sessions is key and gives a huge advantage in the quality of information obtained in this way.

In Remote Viewing, there is a distinction between the person who uses extrasensory perception to receive information about the target and describe it, and the Monitor, whose purpose is to analyze the data in real time and ask neutral questions to help refine the results of the study.

It has been found that one of the greatest obstacles to triggering and maintaining the extrasensory perception process is the analytical mind and the stimulation of the imagination. The right hemisphere of the brain is responsible for the process of extrasensory perception, as it is capable of abstract perception and much more open to the potential of possibilities.

Meanwhile, the left analytical hemisphere, when we perceive information intuitively, tends to reflect and analyze, and question what appears.
When we analyze – we try to guess something, rationalize according to our knowledge limited by our experience, and we activate our imaginations to weave visions that help us to guess the answer by analyzing and “simulating” the issue. This, however, is one of the biggest obstacles to using extrasensory perception. Whenever we start to pledge, evaluate something, try to predict the result based on our previous experiences and knowledge – instead of perceiving what is, our attention begins to focus on our own guesses and thus limit perception.

Through experiments, it was clearly established that whenever perceptual persons started speculating, their extrasensory perception abilities faded out.
In other words: When we have an open mind and we are simply open to what appears in our perception – this is what we perceive – and when we say to ourselves “ok, I know because I can guess”, we stop perceiving and use our own guesses.

Therefore, a special procedure has been developed in Remote Viewing in which the Remote Viewer person is completely relieved of the task of analyzing what he perceives during the session and can focus on reporting what he perceives.
It is the session monitor who has to ask clarifying questions in a way that does not suggest an answer.

Thanks to the blind study and the division into roles, a huge breakthrough has been made in the effective and reliable use of extrasensory perception and the possibility of training people to use it effectively.

3. Research from several independent perspectives

The last, third pillar is the use of research using several independent RV sources, i.e. Remote Viewers independently examining a given target.
There is always a chance of making a mistake. In order to increase the effectiveness of the research, and thus the possibility of obtaining useful, possibly reliable information – a given target may be tested by more than one person. In this way, after completing a session with several independent Remote Viewers and compiling the data – if they coincide at key points – one can be much more confident about the accuracy of such a study.

In summary, the terms of the Remote Viewing study are constructed in such a way as to eliminate the possibility of suggesting a response. In this way, it has been proved beyond reasonable doubt that extrasensory perception works, and moreover, that most people can learn it. That some people still say otherwise is due to ignorance and ignorance of the results of the experiments. Some people just want to believe that it is impossible and are not really interested in any evidence other than what confirms their own beliefs.

You don’t have to take my word for it. You too can do a series of experiments and find out for yourself. I will cover this topic later in the book.

It was fragment from my ebook “Remote Viewing – Development through perception“, which I share for free here on the website.

Jacob Qba Niegowski